623dff8febd57

Nnamdi Kanu files N25bn suit against FG

Chief of the Indigenous Folks of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu who continues to be being detained by the Division of State Companies has filed a lawsuit towards his extradition from Kenya, towards the federal authorities. Within the N25bn lawsuit filed by his Particular Counsel, Mr Aloy Ejimakor, Kanu argued that his extradition was “unconstitutional”. The IPOB chief is…

Chief of the Indigenous Folks of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu who continues to be being detained by the Division of State Companies has filed a lawsuit towards his extradition from Kenya, towards the federal authorities.

Within the N25bn lawsuit filed by his Particular Counsel, Mr Aloy Ejimakor, Kanu argued that his extradition was “unconstitutional”.

The IPOB chief is searching for N25 billion as damages for “the bodily, psychological, emotional, psychological, property” loss he suffered throughout his extradition.

“A declaration that the arrest of the Applicant in Kenya by the Respondents’ brokers with out due means of legislation is unfair, and the Respondents’ enforced disappearance of the Applicant for eight days and their refusal to provide the Applicant earlier than a Kenyan Court docket for the aim of Applicant’s extradition is prohibited, illegal, unconstitutional and quantity to infringement of the Applicant’s basic proper towards arbitrary arrest, to his private liberty and to truthful listening to as enshrined and assured beneath the pertinent provisions of CFRN and the Constitution.

“A declaration that the detention of the Applicant in a non-official secret facility in Kenya and the torture of the Applicant in Kenya by the Respondents’ brokers is prohibited, illegal, unconstitutional and quantity to infringement of the Applicant’s basic proper towards illegal detention, torture and to truthful listening to, as enshrined and assured beneath the pertinent provisions of CFRN and the Constitution).

“A declaration that, pursuant to Article 12(4) of the Constitution, the expulsion (or extraordinary rendition) of the Applicant from Kenya to Nigeria by the Respondents and not using a determination taken in accordance with the legislation of Kenya is prohibited, illegal, unconstitutional and quantities to infringement of the Applicant’s basic proper to truthful listening to and to not be expelled from a State Social gathering to the Constitution besides by advantage of a choice taken in accordance with the legislation, as enshrined and assured beneath the pertinent provisions of CFRN and the Constitution.

“A declaration that any legal prosecution of the Applicant the aim of which the Respondents unlawfully expelled the Applicant from Kenya to Nigeria is prohibited, illegal, unconstitutional and quantities to infringement of the Applicant’s basic proper to truthful listening to, as enshrined and assured beneath the pertinent provisions of CFRN and the Constitution.

“An order of injunction restraining and prohibiting the Respondents from taking any additional step in any legal prosecution of the Applicant enabled by the mentioned illegal expulsion of the Applicant from Kenya to Nigeria.

“An order mandating and compelling the Respondents to forthwith restitute or in any other case restore the Applicant to his liberty, similar being his state of being as of nineteenth June, 2021; and to thereupon repatriate the Applicant to his nation of lawful domicile (to wit: the UK) to await the result of any formal request the Respondents could file earlier than the competent authorities in Britain for the lawful extradition of the Applicant to Nigeria.

“An order mandating and compelling the Respondents to difficulty an official Letter of Apology to the Applicant for the infringement of his basic rights; and publication of mentioned Letter of Apology in three (3) nationwide dailies.

“An order mandating and compelling the Respondents to pay the sum of N25,000,000,000 to the Applicant, being financial damages claimed by the Applicant towards the Respondents collectively and severally for the bodily, psychological, emotional, psychological, property and different damages suffered by the Applicant because of the infringements of Applicant’s basic rights by the Respondents.”

Ejimakor mentioned Nnamdi Kanu approached a Federal Excessive Court docket after the Excessive Court docket of Abia State on January 19, 2022, declined jurisdiction on grounds that rendition, being associated to extradition, lies throughout the unique jurisdiction of the Federal Excessive Court docket.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.