Teresa Giudice’s fiancé Luis Ruelas sued in string of lawsuits

She could need to signal that prenup in spite of everything.

Teresa Giudice’s fiancé, Luis Ruelas, has a historical past of being in authorized sizzling water.

A number of individuals have sued the NJ-based businessman and his firm, Digital Media Solutions, over allegedly unlawful practices.

Web page Six obtained copies of not less than three complaints filed all through 2021 that accused Ruelas’ digital promoting firm of violating the Phone Shopper Safety Act (TCPA).

According to legal experts, the legislation “restricts telemarketing sure telephone calls, textual content messages, and facsimiles. It additionally locations restrictions on using computerized dialing techniques and synthetic or prerecorded voice messages.”

In a since-dismissed grievance filed on Jan. 1, 2021, in Florida, Plaintiff Graham Hooper alleged Digital Media Options engaged “in unsolicited textual content messaging with no regard for shoppers’ privateness rights.”

A few of the messages – submitted as a part of the lawsuit – had been allegedly despatched on June 11, 2020, and solicited items and providers reminiscent of “free months of insurance coverage” and automotive offers.

“Defendant’s unsolicited textual content messages triggered Plaintiff hurt, together with invasion of his
privateness and annoyance,” the courtroom paperwork state. “Defendant’s textual content messages additionally inconvenienced Plaintiff and triggered disruption to his each day life.”

The grievance was filed as a part of a class-action lawsuit from different events who made related allegations. Every sought a minimal of $500 in damages for every violation.

Nonetheless, in October 2021, Hooper voluntarily dismissed the grievance.

A separate since-dismissed grievance filed by a lady named Kelly Schultz on July 27, 2021, in Florida alleged Digital Media Options positioned chilly calls and despatched unsolicited telemarketing
textual content messages with shortened internet hyperlinks which “redirect shoppers to their web sites
to solicit Defendant’s merchandise, together with however not restricted to, Quotza.com, which sells
auto insurance coverage quotes.”

Schultz claimed Ruelas’ firm pulled her quantity from the Do Not Name registry, and triggered the Plaintiff “annoyance, nuisance, and invasion of privateness, and disturbed the use and delight of her telephone, along with the damage and tear on the telephone’s {hardware} (together with the telephone’s battery) and the consumption of reminiscence on the telephone.”

That case, nonetheless, was additionally voluntarily dismissed in March 2022.

However earlier than the second grievance was dismissed, a 3rd individual filed an analogous grievance in California in December 2021.

Aaron L. Johnson alleged Digital Media Options (DMS) positioned calls to him utilizing an “synthetic or prerecorded voice,” inflicting a “nice deal of frustration and inconvenience.”

The Plaintiff is searching for $500 for every name made that allegedly violated the TCPA. It’s unclear what number of calls Johnson obtained.

DMS denied all of the allegations in a response filed on Feb. 7, 2022. As of March 14, 2022, that case was nonetheless open.

In Spring of 2021, DMS was below hearth but once more for a separate allegedly shady enterprise observe.

The Delaware-based firm was accused by an Illinois firm referred to as Insurance coverage King Company, Inc of “false commercials” and “copyright infringements,” in keeping with paperwork obtained by Web page Six.

The attorneys for the plaintiff argued in a discover despatched in Might 2021 to DMS that when web customers typed “insurance coverage king” within the search bar, they had been delivered to an advert which made a “false affiliation” with their consumer and in addition provided a $19 a month insurance coverage quote. “We’ve discovered no proof to recommend that you just in truth supply automotive insurance coverage for $19 a month as marketed,” the letter additional acknowledged.

Insurance coverage King Company, Inc formally filed a grievance with the US District Court docket of Southern California on Aug. 31, 2021.

Nonetheless, DMS responded to the grievance in October 2021 and denied all of the allegations through their legal professional, citing the Truthful Use legislation as a part of their protection.

“The claims made within the Criticism are barred, in complete or partly, by the
doctrines of honest use, nominative honest use, and/or descriptive use,” the courtroom doc states. In addition they famous a “lack of irreparable hurt,” amongst different defenses.

That case stays open. The newest occasion was that DMS filed one other response to an amended grievance on Feb. 22, 2022.

Apart from alleged TCPA violations and copyright infringements, Ruelas was named in one other lawsuit in September 2021 for allegedly mismanaging funds from a vendor he had a enterprise partnership with.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc alleged in courtroom paperwork obtained by Web page Six that Produce Depot, Ruelas’ different firm, “failed and refused to pay for the commodities it ordered, obtained, and accepted from Plaintiff, regardless of due demand.”

The Plaintiff mentioned it bought “recent fruit and greens” to Produce Depot for a complete of “$113,404.40,” and was compelled to file for chapter in March 2022.

According to The Sun, Ruelas and his enterprise companions responded to the lawsuit in December 2021, and claimed they had been “not people that are or had been in custody, management or administration” of the produce enterprise. In addition they reportedly requested the decide to dismiss the case.

The string of authorized points Ruelas, 46, seems to be dealing with involves the forefront lower than two months after Giudice, 49, revealed on “Watch What Happens Live” that she and her fiancé had not mentioned a plan to signal a prenuptial settlement.

Host Andy Cohen, who appeared shocked over the revelation, continued to emphasise the significance of the authorized doc, telling the “RHONJ” star, “You simply put it in writing, however in fact they don’t need to take something from one another.”

Giudice and Ruelas acquired engaged in October 2021 after courting for simply over a yr.

A rep for the Bravo star declined to remark. Ruelas’ legal professional didn’t instantly reply to Web page Six’s request for remark.