How did the Civil Rights Act of 1991 amend the original Civil Rights Act of 1964?

The Act was amended to provide that an employee could prove a case by showing either that an individual practice or group of practices resulted in “a disparate impact on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, and the respondent fails to demonstrate that such practice is required by businessClick to see full answer. Likewise, people ask, in what way did the Civil Rights Act of 1991 amend Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964?Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin. The Civil Rights Act of 1991 (Pub. L. In addition, section 102 of the CRA (which is printed elsewhere in this publication) amends the Revised Statutes by adding a new section following section 1977 (42 U.S.C.Beside above, what was the purpose of the Civil Rights Act of 1991? An Act to amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to strengthen and improve Federal civil rights laws, to provide for damages in cases of intentional employment discrimination, to clarify provisions regarding disparate impact actions, and for other purposes. This Act may be cited as the “Civil Rights Act of 1991.” Likewise, how does the Civil Rights Act of 1991 differ from the Civil Rights Act of 1964? The Civil Rights Act (CRA) of 1991, enacted into law on 21 November, was the most comprehensive civil rights legislation to pass Congress since the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Like the 1964 landmark, the 1991 act prohibits all discrimination in employment based on race, gender, color, religious, or ethnic considerations.How did the Civil Rights Act of 1964 affect employment?The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) outlawed the unequal application of voter registration requirements and discrimination in public facilities, in government, and in employment. Specifically, for employers, in the Civil Rights Act, Title 7 guaranteed equal opportunity in employment.