Is zakaat al-fitr due from one who did not fast in Ramadaan because of a valid excuse?

Question

Praise be to Allah.

The majority of scholars, including the four imams and
others, are of the view that zakaat al-fitr is due from the Muslim even if
he did not fast Ramadaan. No one else differed from that except Sa’eed ibn
al-Musayyab and al-Hasan al-Basri, who said that zakaat al-fitr is due only
from those who fasted. But the correct view is that of the majority, because
of the following evidence:

1 –The general meaning of the hadeeth which is the basis for
zakaat al-fitr being obligatory:

It was narrated that Ibn ‘Umar (may Allaah be pleased with
him) said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be
upon him) enjoined zakaat al-fitr, a saa’ of dates or a saa’ of barley, upon
everyone, slave or free, male or female, young or old, and he enjoined that
it be paid before the people went out to pray. Narrated by al-Bukhaari
(1503) and Muslim (984).

The word “young” includes small children who cannot fast.

2 – When charity and zakaah are enjoined, it is usually to
help the poor and needy, and is aimed at achieving some degree of social
security, and the most obvious case is zakaat al-fitr, which is enjoined
upon young and old, free and slave, male and female, and the Lawgiver did
not stipulate any minimum threshold (nisaab) or the passage of one year for
it to be obligatory. Hence the fact that it is obligatory for those who did
not fast in Ramadaan, with or without an excuse, is implied in the purpose
for which this zakaah is prescribed.

3 – With regard to the argument of those who quoted as
evidence the words of Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with him): The
Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him)
enjoined zakaat al-fitr as a purification for the fasting person from idle
talk and obscene speech, and to feed the poor. Narrated by Abu Dawood (1609)

They said: The words “as a purification for the fasting
person” means that zakaat al-fitr is obligatory only for those who fasted.
Al-Haafiz Ibn Hajar responded to that in al-Fath (3/369) where he
said:

My response is that mentioning purification refers to the
usual case (as most people fast), just as it is also required of those who
did not commit sin, such as one who is very righteous or one who became
Muslim a moment before the sun set. End quote.

What this means is that in most cases zakaat al-fitr is
prescribed because it is a purification for the one who fasted, but
attaining this purification is not a condition of it being obligatory. A
similar case is the zakaah of one’s wealth, which has also been prescribed
in order to purify the soul:

“Take Sadaqah (alms) from their wealth in order to purify
them and sanctify them with it, and invoke Allaah for them. Verily, your
invocations are a source of security for them; and Allaah is All-Hearer,
All-Knower”

[al-Tawbah 9:103]

Despite that zakaah is obligatory in the case of wealth
belonging to a small child who does not need to be purified, because no bad
deeds are recorded for him.

Shaykh Ibn Jibreen gave another response, and said:

It is paid on behalf of children and those who are not
accountable, and those who did not fast because of an excuse such as
sickness or travel. So the purification is for the guardians of those who
are not accountable, and it is a purification for the one who did not fast
because of an excuse, on the assumption that he will fast once the excuse is
no longer in effect, so it is purification in advance, before he fasts or
completes his fast. End quote.

Fataawa al-Zakaah (zakaat al-fitr/2)

And Allaah knows best.