She did not have any milk in her breasts so she fed her baby girl butter and she died

Question A woman gave birth to a daughter more than fifty years ago, but there was no milk in this woman’s breast, so she gave the girl butter, and after approximately six days the child died. Is there any sin on the mother for that? She is afraid that she is the one who caused…

Question

A woman gave birth to a daughter more than fifty years ago, but there was no milk in this woman’s breast, so she gave the girl butter, and after approximately six days the child died.

Is there any sin on the mother for that?

She is afraid that she is the one who caused her death, i.e., that the child died because of the butter.

The mother did not know that butter would cause the child to die; if she had known that butter would cause her to die, she would not have given it to her daughter.

Praise be to Allah.

The Islamic
ruling in this case depends on asking specialist doctors. If they say that
giving butter to a newborn will cause the child to die, then this mother
killed her daughter by accident. If they say that it does not lead to death,
then there is no sin on the mother, because she did not cause the death of
her child. If the doctors are not sure whether this was the cause of death
or not, then there is no sin on the mother in this case either.

Based on
this, it is essential to ask those who are expert and have knowledge of such
matters.

Shaykh ‘Abd
al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:

If she is
not sure whether the child died because of her, then there is no sin on her,
because the basic principle a person is not obligated in any way unless
there definite evidence. End quote. Majmoo’ Fataawa Ibn Baaz,
22/327.

If it is
proven that the butter was the cause of death, this killing is to be
regarded as accidental because the mother did not intend to kill her child.

Two things
are required in the case of accidental killing: diyah (blood money) and
kafaarah (expiation)

In the
answer to question no. 52809
we have stated that the diyah in the case of accidental killing must be paid
by the ‘aaqilah (male relatives on the father’s side) of the killer, not by
the killer himself, and the ‘aaqilah includes the male relatives such as the
father, son, brothers, paternal uncles and so on.

The
expiation is required from the killer himself, and the expiation is to free
a believing slave; if that is not possible then he must fast for two
consecutive months.

It says in
al-Mawsoo’ah al-Fiqhiyyah (16/62):

There is no
difference of opinion among the fuqaha’ that accidental killing means cases
where a person did not intend either to strike or to kill, such as if a
person shoots at game or a target but hits a person instead, or if a sleeper
rolls over on top of a person and kills him. This means that the diyah must
be paid by his ‘aaqilah and the expiation is also required. End quote.

It says in
Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah (21/245, 248)

The diyah
for a child who is killed accidentally after being born alive is like the
diyah for a woman, which is half the diyah for a male. The diyah must be
paid to the heirs. End quote.

And Allaah
knows best.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.