Should I delete feature branches?
Oh, and after merge (with fast-forward) you should delete feature branch. It’s worthless to keep them around if you made commit messages meaningful and track features/bugs in a bug tracker. They just add noise when browsing history.Click to see full answer. Beside this, should I delete branches?8 Answers. You can safely remove a branch with…
Oh, and after merge (with fast-forward) you should delete feature branch. It’s worthless to keep them around if you made commit messages meaningful and track features/bugs in a bug tracker. They just add noise when browsing history.Click to see full answer. Beside this, should I delete branches?8 Answers. You can safely remove a branch with git branch -d yourbranch . If it contains unmerged changes (ie, you would lose commits by deleting the branch), git will tell you and won’t delete it. So, deleting a merged branch is cheap and won’t make you lose any history. does deleting a branch delete commits? Deleting a branch just deletes the pointer to the commit. The commit or commits associated with the branch are not removed — at least no immediately. Developers often delete a branch after it has been merged into another branch. In this case, all of the commits will remain in the repository. In this manner, should I delete merged branches? 2 Answers. the way git works is that a branch name is just a pointer to a specific commit. So you should feel perfectly safe deleting the branch after the merge. One more thing you could do though, is once the hotfix is merged, create a tag on the master branch identifying that point as the hotfix release.How do I delete a git feature branch? Deleting remote branches Instead, use the git push command with –delete flag, followed by the name of the branch you want to delete. You also need to specify the remote name ( origin in this case) after git branch . Level up your coding skills, quickly and efficiently.
