Should juveniles be given full constitutional rights in criminal matters?

The United States Supreme Court has held that in juvenile commitment proceedings, juvenile courts must afford to juveniles basic constitutional protections, such as advance notice of the charges, the right to counsel, the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and the right to remain silent.Click to see full answer. Just so, what are the most important legal rights of juveniles? Constitutional Rights in Juvenile Cases Right to a phone call. No right to bail. The right to counsel. The right to notice of the charges. The right to confront and cross-examine witnesses. The privilege against self-incrimination. No (or limited) right to a jury trial. The right to have charges proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Similarly, what are the constitutional safeguards that are associated with criminal juvenile proceedings? The United States Supreme Court has held that in juvenile commitment proceedings, juvenile courts must afford to juveniles basic constitutional protections, such as advance notice of the charges, the right to counsel, the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and the right to remain silent. Beside this, why should juveniles not have the same rights as adults in the criminal justice process? Juveniles don’t have all of the same constitutional rights in juvenile proceedings as adults do. For example, juveniles’ adjudication hearings are heard by judges because youthful offenders don’t have the right to a trial by jury of their peers. They also don’t have the right to bail or to a public trial.What are the rights of juveniles when taken into custody?(a) A juvenile in custody has the right to the assistance of counsel and the right to remain silent when questioned about the juvenile’s involvement in criminal activity by a law-enforcement officer.