What flaw did the US Supreme Court find in the 1996 Communications Decency Act?

ACLU. The provisions regarding indecent and patently offensive materials were found to violate the freedom of speech protected by the First Amendment and were removed from the CDA.Click to see full answer. In this manner, what is the Communications Decency Act of 1996?The Communications Decency Act of 1996 (CDA) was the first notable attempt by the United States Congress to regulate pornographic material on the Internet. In 1997, in the landmark case of Reno v. ACLU, the United States Supreme Court struck the anti-indecency provisions of the act.Furthermore, what is fosta Sesta and what is its relationship to the Communications Decency Act of 1996? FOSTA-SESTA is now law. The legislation, a combination of the Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act (FOSTA) and the Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act (SESTA), makes websites liable for knowingly facilitating sex trafficking or intentionally promoting the prostitution of others (pimping). Similarly one may ask, why was the Communications Decency Act struck down by the Supreme Court? Supreme Court Declares Communications Decency Act Unconstitutional. In a landmark decision defining constitutional protections in cyberspace, the United States Supreme Court declared the Communications Decency Act (“CDA”) unconstitutional, holding that the Act unconstitutionally abridged free speech rights.Is the Communications Decency Act still in effect?The Internet community as a whole objected strongly to the Communications Decency Act, and with EFF’s help, the anti-free speech provisions were struck down by the Supreme Court. But thankfully, CDA 230 remains and in the years since has far outshone the rest of the law.