What is the problem with auteur theory?

The problem with this theory is that it creates a narrow-minded idea of what a “true” artist of a film is. I don’t think that the idea of the auteur should go away, but it should be expanded to many of the other fields within a given film equally.Click to see full answer. Also question is, what does auteur theory mean?Auteur Theory is a way of looking at films that state that the director is the “author” of a film. A filmmaker singled out by the Cahiers critics who was the definition of the idea of the auteur is Alfred Hitchcock. By many Hitchcock was viewed primarily as a “vulgar showman” who made commercial thrillers.Similarly, what is the auteur theory of film criticism? Auteur theory, theory of filmmaking in which the director is viewed as the major creative force in a motion picture. Arising in France in the late 1940s, the auteur theory—as it was dubbed by the American film critic Andrew Sarris—was an outgrowth of the cinematic theories of André Bazin and Alexandre Astruc. Similarly, it is asked, why is auteur theory important? The Auteur theory argues that a film is a reflection of the director’s artistic vision; so, a movie directed by a given filmmaker will have recognizable, recurring themes and visual queues that inform the audience who the director is (think a Hitchcock or Tarantino film) and shows a consistent artistic identityDo you agree with the auteur theory?The “auteur theory” is a way of looking at films that focuses on the director as the “author” of the film. If we agree with this theory, then we most likely think that a film is a reflection of the director, and that certain directors will give a film a particular tone and feeling that we can associate with them.