What reasons might an attorney use a peremptory challenge?

A peremptory challenge can be a major part of voir dire. A peremptory challenge also allows attorneys to veto a potential juror on a “hunch”. The idea behind peremptory challenges is that if both parties have contributed in the configuration of the jury, they will find its verdict more acceptable.Click to see full answer. Furthermore, does an attorney need a reason to use a peremptory challenge?A peremptory challenge is used by attorneys in the jury selection process to excuse potential jurors without providing a reason why. In this lesson you will learn about the use of peremptory strikes, as well as the laws designed to protect the integrity of the process.Also, what is the difference between challenges for cause and peremptory challenges? There are two basic differences between a challenge for cause and a peremptory challenge. A lawyer may generally use a peremptory challenge without giving a reason. Second, the number of challenges for cause available to the attorneys is unlimited, while the number of peremptory challenges is limited by statute. Also know, what is the reason that a lawyer must give for a peremptory challenge of a prospective juror? No reason is required for a lawyer to use a peremptory challenge to excuse a potential juror. Such challenges allow each side to dismiss jurors who are otherwise qualified, but appear likely to favor the opposing party. However, peremptory challenges cannot be used to exclude jurors on the basis of race or class.Why do some jurors get dismissed?If either lawyer believes there is information that suggests a juror is prejudiced about the case, he or she can ask the judge to dismiss that juror for cause. In effect, they allow a lawyer to dismiss a juror because of a belief that the juror will not serve the best interests of the client.